Post by account_disabled on Jan 1, 2024 0:53:35 GMT -8
Afor resolving some legal issues examines the referral made by the Sibiu Court Section II civil administrative and fiscal litigation in File no. . regarding the pronouncement of a preliminary decision to resolve some legal issues related to the interpretation of the provisions of art. para. from Government Ordinance no. regarding the legal regime of contraventions approved with amendments and additions by Law no. with subsequent amendments and additions Government Ordinance no. in relation to the following aspects if the complaint against the report establishing the contravention must also be substantiated within the term of days from the date of handing over or.
Vommunication of the contravention report if the sanction Country Email List that intervenes in the case of not justifying the contravention complaint within this term is the forfeiture of the violators right to invoke any further aspects of illegality and unfoundedness of the contravention report or the forfeiture of the right to invoke other aspects of the illegality of the report apart from those provided by art. of Government Ordinance no. under the penalty of nullity which the court can also find ex officio.
The assistant magistrate presents the report on the object of the referral showing that some courts have communicated jurisprudence and points of view regarding the legal issues under discussion and the report drawn up by the judgerapporteur was submitted to the file according to the provisions of art. para. of the Civil Procedure Code the report was communicated to the parties who did not express their point of view. Following the deliberations the High Court of Cassation and Justice Full Court for resolving some legal issues remains in the process of ruling on the referral. with which it was referred states the following I. Holder and subject of notification . The Sibiu Court Second Civil.
Vommunication of the contravention report if the sanction Country Email List that intervenes in the case of not justifying the contravention complaint within this term is the forfeiture of the violators right to invoke any further aspects of illegality and unfoundedness of the contravention report or the forfeiture of the right to invoke other aspects of the illegality of the report apart from those provided by art. of Government Ordinance no. under the penalty of nullity which the court can also find ex officio.
The assistant magistrate presents the report on the object of the referral showing that some courts have communicated jurisprudence and points of view regarding the legal issues under discussion and the report drawn up by the judgerapporteur was submitted to the file according to the provisions of art. para. of the Civil Procedure Code the report was communicated to the parties who did not express their point of view. Following the deliberations the High Court of Cassation and Justice Full Court for resolving some legal issues remains in the process of ruling on the referral. with which it was referred states the following I. Holder and subject of notification . The Sibiu Court Second Civil.
